MA Project – Final Week
21st July 14:00–17:00
MA Project Final Critic
Guest critic by David Leech
21st July at 17:30
'First thoughts... built and unbuilt.'
Guest lecture by David Leech
The Master Project, which is open for Diploma and MA students, is a design project run over the course of a semester. The project, framed within a thematic investigation, is carried out in small groups, each contributing to a wider group study of a given situation and project. A specific neighbourhood or context is chosen in a European city within which students act on a variety of sites.
The main design engages with three overall themes: programme - examining arrangements of use and the spatial potential in the plan, type - exploring how type informs use and affects our experience and construction – seeking a rigorous and conceptual understanding of construction.
Underlying these themes is an interest in atmosphere in relation to experience and adjustment in relation to place. In the last two years emphasis has been given in the teaching to the programmatic theme of spatial planning and then to building type or typology. This year we are focusing on construction.
When we refer to construction we do so as both an artistic and practical endeavour. We encourage construction ideas which, through their strategy and detail, reinforce the idea of the building, the space within and the space between. We expect a practical understanding and an appropriate respect for structure and material. What we seek overall is an expression of an appropriate character, atmosphere and presence through the physicality of construction. Our interest is in the relationships between building, place and use. We therefore prioritise a phenomenological approach to the study of this theme which is analytical but based upon ideas and concepts rather than rules and dogma.
SS 2020 – Master Project
The Architecture of the Block
Test planning in Milbertshofen
The urban perimeter block defines and gives shape to the European city. Consistent edges clarify the threshold between the public and the private domain. The perimeter structure gives definition to the street with facades that conform to some consistent rules and it contains an inner space or courtyard that provides air, sun and recreational space to the inhabitants. The simplicity and directness of this urban figure gives it great versatility in organization and economy of space. Territory is clearly demarcated - everyone understands it – both the passer-by who might judge their journey through the city by the number of blocks they pace past or by the inhabitant who knows that once they cross the threshold of the gate or the porch-door know that they are home.
The length and scale of blocks make them unique and often contributes to giving individual cities their identity over others, think of the 113.3m chamfered blocks of Barcelona or the long 185m blocks in Munich’s Maxvorstadt district for example. The facades conforming to a consistent scale and texture can be diverse in their definition, as a group of houses bunched up together on the one hand or as an immense physical mass employing a repetition of sameness on the other. Variations like internal streets, sequences of courtyards, courts towards the street and lower internal buildings, developed over time, give the block a further complexity but the overriding sense of wholeness, of figure and ground, give the block an enduring and familiar quality.
We are interested in how Theodor Fischer, while Head of the office of urban expansion in Munich in the late 1890’s, author of the Staffelbauplan of Munich (graduated building plan) of 1904 and later as joint founder of the Deutscher Werkbund 1907 and member of the German Garden City Movement reinterpreted the character of the urban block with a more open character defined by large urban villas. These villas of collective occupation conform to the guidelines of the disciplined block but gaps are allowed to form between them, describing the buildings as figures, giving greater opportunities in internal planning and allowing air and views into the heart of the block. Fischer’s ideas gave the block a greater potential for a coherent diversity and allowed the informality of the inner block to become part of the urban encounter.
Fischer demonstrated that the block can accommodate different ideas and typologies, not as an excuse for generating cosmetic differences to make similar buildings look as different as possible but as a way of tuning the urban figure to its place in the city, its outlook to view or response to orientation and climate. Buildings remain integral parts of a greater whole but they display a character of their own which contributes to a continuing narrative of city life and day to day experience. This semester we shall explore the potential in the architecture of the block by carrying out test planning and scenario studies in the neighbourhood of Milbertshofen, in northern Munich - to consider the principles of a tolerant and picturesque urbanism that epitomizes the best aspects of the European city.
Stephen Bates and Bruno Krucker, March 2020
The Architecture of the Block
Urban block, Cadix, Antwerp, Sergison Bates architects / Bovenbouw / Bulk
Waterside housing, Cadix, Antwerp, Sergison Bates architects
Model study, joint work of Büro Krucker / Hild und K / Sergison Bates architects
Munich Schwabing (Photographs: SKB)
Figure ground plan of Munich, Milbertshofen area in red
The Architecture of the Block – Semester theme
Milbertshofen – Photo documentation
Milbertshofen – Plan material
* password required
Introduction model making
Introduction exercise one
Introduction exercise two
Introduction exercise three
Introduction exercise four
Introduction exercise five
Introduction exercise six
Introduction exercise seven
* password required